Tuesday, May 03, 2011

Osama bin Laden and the fight against the West

The news of Osama bin Laden has trumped all domestic squables and personalities. Even the pouty mouthed bad-hair-day Donald Trump whose claim to fame in bringing to the press Obamas birth certificate, seems like a mosquito in front of the new eagle of the day, Barack Obama. Yes, Obama is now soaring on the wings of international fame and awe as he can take full credit for being the CIC of the US military that directed this operation.

No person should have died in 9-1-1, neither American nor foreign born. For disbelievers of the singular role of Al Qaida in 9-1-1 like myself, the blame for those deaths in NY and elsewhere rests on many souls and not just bin Laden and his followers. The facts that surround the inconsistencies of the the Twin Tower attack point to multiple complicities and cooperation between domestic and foreign groups. Bin Laden and Al Qaida cannot claim their attack was theirs alone and neither should they be the only targets of justice. But it was convenient to make them the reason for two wars and many trillions of US tax payer money for questionable public gain.

Bin Laden has been the most wanted person in the last 10 years. Nazi criminals (notice how they are never called terrorists) were brought to international courts of law where the rule of law applied and they were tried according to the international values of impartial justice. I continue to be uncomfortable with the cowboy justice of the United States, in the footsteps of Israel, with extra-judicial killings. Why would bin Laden not be brought to justice in an orange jump suit like Timothy McVay was arraigned and tried in court? Was TMV not a terrorist? Why was he not executed in his bedroom in a Navy Seals operation? Killed and dumped in the ocean for bin Laden? Not that he should not have faced the death penalty? Frankly the bastard and his group have made my life and millions of Americans lives miserable because I have to take off my shoes at the airport now and I cannot take a 6 oz bottle of cologne on board... I trivialize this absurdity of effect but in reality nothing good came of bin Laden and nothing good comes of Al Qaida, neither for Arabs, muslims, or anti-Americans. Even those of us pacifists who oppose US foreign policy yet would never raise a finger to harm others, have no joy in learning of Al Qaida exploits and could have found satisfaction in a proper trial of bin Laden in an international courtroom.

Bin Laden would have had too much to say I believe. His accomplices would be named. So not only is the evidence of complicity and collusion erased in the Bourne-like execution of bin Laden, it also functions to strengthen the Israeli-style extrajudicial killings of individuals.

Now, rather than discussing extraction of US from Iraq and Afghanistan and shutting down some of the 800+ military bases around the world, the hawks and pundits are emboldened by this Clint Eastwood version of justice. Shoot and dont ask questions, not now, not later. Congress will call for additional strikes around the world with the babble of "keeping the world safer." Already I am hearing about the future leaders of Al Qaida. The nightmare of perpetual "war on terror" is not ending, its just beginning. The press is all to happy to build this scenario of reprisals and revenge attacks. The death of bin Laden becomes the opening of a new chapter rather than the closing of a dreadful decade. War, killing, death, propaganda are all injected with dizzy hunger for more power and control.

As long as the discussion is framed by neoconservative and rightist pundits and politicians, the public will continue to be fed a diet of fear and temerity that allows the corporate state to control the lives of its domestic and foreign subjects.

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Is there one Israeli politician who is not a crook?

(Reuters) - Israel's attorney-general told Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman on Wednesday that he faced indictment for fraud, money laundering and witness-tempering, charges that could force his resignation.

Attorney-General Yehuda Weinstein would allow Lieberman, who has denied wrongdoing, to plead his case in person before deciding whether to indict him, the Justice Ministry said in a statement.

The announcement came as Lieberman, a senior figure in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's conservative coalition government, oversaw a conference of his ultranationalist Yisrael Beiteinu party in Jerusalem. He and his aides had no immediate comment.

Allegations against Lieberman center on the transfer of millions of shekels to what police described as shell companies and accounts belonging to people close to him.

Police had also alleged that Israel's ambassador to Belarus had leaked information to Lieberman about the proceedings against him.

Though police had recommended Lieberman also be indicted for bribery, this charge did not appear in the Justice Ministry statement.

Israel's Supreme Court ruled in a 1993 case that the prime minister was required to dismiss a government official who was charged with a crime. Israeli legal analysts say this precedent means Lieberman would be required to step down if indicted.
--------------------
I say hang the mo--f--er by his --lls and return him in a garbage pail to Belarus.

Monday, March 14, 2011

Friday, February 18, 2011

Wisconsin protestors block Senate doors as more pour into the state capitol

Bernstein, Goodman, Bell, Morozov, Shirkey and Bishara on Empire

EMPIRE, with Marwan Bishara: Carl Bernstein, a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist; Amy Goodman, the host and executive producer of Democracy Now!; Professor Emily Bell, the director of digital journalism at Columbia University; Evgeny Morozov, the author of The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom; Professor Clay Shirky, the author of Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Egypt: Why Is The United States Afraid Of Arab Democracy?

Ussama Makdisi

Posted: February 15, 2011 07:11 AM in HUFFINGTON POST

The Arab world is witnessing a revolution. After decades of apathy and repression, Arab citizens are finally rising up against ossified, undemocratic regimes that have been backed by the West. Whereas the Tunisian revolution caught the United States--and much of the Arab world--by surprise, it is clear that the events unfolding in Egypt have been of much greater concern to the Obama administration.
The awkward, hesitant response on the part of U.S. officials to the events on the ground has been startling. President Obama may have belatedly accepted Hosni Mubarak's departure, but he did so only after it was clear that millions of Egyptians would settle for nothing less. The difference in the open, enthusiastic American embrace and support for Iranian protesters in 2009--or the anti-communist revolutions that swept Eastern Europe two decades ago--and the American scramble to salvage the status quo in the Arab world is nothing short of stark.

Why is the United States afraid of Arab democracy?
The answer is that in large part the outrage of the people being expressed on the streets is more than a revolution in Arab affairs. Although they are unquestionably first and foremost a revolt against unpopular and illegitimate governments and the economic and political despair these governments have engendered, the mass protests are also a revolt against American foreign policy itself. For decades, successive U.S. Republican and Democratic administrations have supported repressive Arab regimes in the name of the "stability" of a strategic, oil-rich region. This discourse of stability rationalized repression of Arab citizens. It isn't that American diplomats, intelligence agencies and officials have not known about the torture and disenfranchisement rampant across the Middle East. They have known, and, as the secret rendition program illustrates, many among them have been prepared to exploit this sordid reality in the name of protecting U.S. interests. The United States has assumed that Arab voices, desires, aspirations, and fears are inconsequential to its hegemony over the region.
The peace process is an obvious case in point. Unlike Saudi Arabia, Egypt is not an important economic ally of the U.S. But it has been a crucial client state that is at the heart of normalizing Arab relations with Israel. One of the most notable refrains of American commentators and officials concerned with events in Egypt is not the lack of democracy in Egypt, but the fear that Egypt's peace treaty with Israel would be jeopardized by a popular revolution. Yet most Americans don't realize that the American peace process has been dependent on oppressive Arab regimes. The Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty of 1979, like the Jordanian-Israeli treaty that followed in 1994, was negotiated by Arab autocrats--Anwar Sadat and King Hussein respectively. They may have delivered cold peace with Israel, but the quid pro quo of these treaties was the acquiescence to Israeli colonialism in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The presidential term of U.S-backed Mahmoud Abbas expired in 2009. Yet his Palestinian Authority continues to be heavily subsidized by the United States. Hamas, by contrast, actually won the Palestinian elections in 2006. The U.S. refused to recognize the outcome, and instead has worked actively with Israel and the Palestinian Authority to undermine the results of that democratic election.
Certainly, Egyptians today are not focused on Palestine but on their own country. They want freedom, not war. But Egyptians are also part of the Arab world. They may no longer accept, for example, to have their government participate in the terrible siege of Gaza.
The emergence of new democratic movements in the Arab world will demand accountability from Arab rulers; but they are just as likely to demand a new approach to the peace process. For decades, U.S.-led "peace" making has been based exclusively on Israel's security concerns and its internal politics, on whittling away Palestinian rights, and on denying the real political significance of an overwhelming Arab sense of injustice at Zionist colonialism in Palestine.
In the meantime, the struggle for freedom in the Arab world will likely only get more desperate. As events in Egypt have demonstrated, Arab autocrats will not abdicate willingly. But ordinary people insist on real change. Mubarak's sudden downfall is a testament to the strength of a human desire for dignity. Because its hegemony in the Middle East has been so unpopular, the United States may soon have to confront a day of reckoning when Arabs finally achieve their democratic rights.
The irony is that the idea of self-determination began with an American president, Woodrow Wilson. Yet this idea has been systematically betrayed by the US in the Middle East since 1947. 2011 may well mark the beginning of the end of corrupt Arab regimes. And with the fall of these regimes there will be an opportunity to build not only a free Arab world, but an American foreign policy that supports this powerful current, and not, as it has done for decades, stand in its way.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

How stupid can you be? Sarah Palin making no sense on Egypt

“And nobody yet has, nobody yet has explained to the American public what they know, and surely they know more than the rest of us know who it is who will be taking the place of Mubarak and no, not, not real enthused about what it is that that’s being done on a national level and from DC in regards to understanding all the situation there in Egypt. And, in these areas that are so volatile right now, because obviously it’s not just Egypt but the other countries too where we are seeing uprisings, we know that now more than ever, we need strength and sound mind there in the White House. We need to know what it is that America stands for so we know who it is that America will stand with. And, we do not have all that information yet.”

Source: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/05/palin-criticizes-obama-on-egypt/

Saeb Erakat Resigns? Good Riddance and take Abbas with you!


Saeb Erakat, you bastard "negotiator"--making concessions that you dont have a right to make--go away now and don't come back. Please take your f-king president, the traitor Mahmoud Abbas, with you. Obviously no one pays attention to either of you anyway. You wanted to give away our land and accept the illegal Israeli settlements on Palestinian land? May you both rot in a smelly dark gutter away from the people that you betrayed. Be gone with both of you.


Friday, February 11, 2011

Wow Wow Wow!!! Hosni is Gone Gone Gone!!!

The people have won! Long live democracy, long live the people of Egypt, long live the Arab nations and their people!

So you don't want to go Hosni?

The man on the right wants to be buried in
Egypt. The man on the left wanted to bury all of
Egypt in Egypt. The two appear to be friends and share a common goal. Wow.